AND Digital vs Spaceberry Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
AND Digital (3.6/5) edges ahead of Spaceberry Studio (3.6/5) overall. AND Digital is the better choice for large UK enterprises, design plus team capability-building. Spaceberry Studio is the stronger option for budget-conscious SaaS/AI/mobile teams, low-commitment subscription. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
AND Digital vs Spaceberry Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | AND Digital | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2016 |
| HQ | London, UK (Covent Garden; also Maidenhead and Leeds) | Ukraine (also London, UK) |
| Team size | 1,001–5,000 | 12–50 |
| Rating | 3.6 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Pairs product delivery for named enterprise clients (British Airways, Condé Nast) with capability-building for the client's own teams, at 1,000+ person UK scale | One of the most accessible entry points in this pool via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract |
| Pricing model | Enterprise consulting engagement (project-based or retainer) | Monthly subscription (dedicated designer) |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Design systems/Storybook | Figma, Framer, Webflow |
| Industries served | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
AND Digital vs Spaceberry Studio: overview
AND Digital
AND Digital started in London's Covent Garden in 2014, building a product-development-and-team-building consultancy that now runs 1,001–5,000 people across multiple UK offices, including Maidenhead and Leeds. The firm's pitch blends technical delivery with talent development — it doesn't just design and build products for clients like British Airways, Condé Nast, The Telegraph, and Gousto, it also trains client teams to sustain the work afterward.
Spaceberry Studio
Spaceberry Studio started in 2016 as 'MainCode Agency,' rebranding to Spaceberry in 2020 — 2016 is used as the founding year here since it's the same continuous team and entity. Based in Ukraine with an additional London office, the company runs 12–50 employees depending on source, selling subscription-style UI/UX design for SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than quoting fixed-price projects — one of two subscription models in this pool alongside Eleken.
Services and capabilities: AND Digital vs Spaceberry Studio
| Capability | AND Digital | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: AND Digital vs Spaceberry Studio
| Framework / platform | AND Digital | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | ✓ |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | ✓ | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: AND Digital vs Spaceberry Studio
| Criterion | AND Digital | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer, Dedicated team | Subscription |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: AND Digital vs Spaceberry Studio
| Dimension | AND Digital | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Large UK enterprise product redesign with an internal capability-building component, Media or travel-sector digital product delivery at scale | Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription, AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Subscription |
AND Digital vs Spaceberry Studio: pros and cons
| AND Digital | |
|---|---|
| + | Named enterprise client list (British Airways, Condé Nast, The Telegraph, Gousto) demonstrates real delivery scale |
| + | 1,001–5,000 employees give it significant UK delivery capacity |
| + | Combines product delivery with training the client's own team, not just a hand-off at project end |
| + | Multiple UK office locations (London, Maidenhead, Leeds) support regional delivery |
| - | UK-concentrated office footprint offers less multi-region coverage than global agency networks |
| - | Large consultancy scale and pricing are less accessible to startups than boutique studios |
| - | Talent-development-plus-delivery positioning means less singular focus on pure design than product-design-only specialists |
| Spaceberry Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here |
| + | Focused specifically on SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than spreading thin across many verticals |
| + | London, UK location adds geographic diversification alongside its Ukraine base |
| + | Continuous operation since 2016, spanning its 2020 rebrand from MainCode Agency |
| - | Smallest reported team-size band (12–50) among the boutiques in this pool, limiting capacity for large programs |
| - | Rebranded from MainCode Agency in 2020, so some pre-2020 case studies may appear under the earlier name |
| - | Subscription-only model may not suit clients preferring a single fixed-price contract with a defined end date |
Who should choose AND Digital?
A typical fit: large UK enterprise product redesign with an internal capability-building component.
Pairs product delivery for named enterprise clients (British Airways, Condé Nast) with capability-building for the client's own teams, at 1,000+ person UK scale. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment.
Who should choose Spaceberry Studio?
A typical fit: ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription.
One of the most accessible entry points in this pool via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. Minimum engagement starts at $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: AND Digital vs Spaceberry Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | AND Digital |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | AND Digital |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: AND Digital (Not published) vs Spaceberry Studio ($4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | AND Digital |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: AND Digital vs Spaceberry Studio
| Use case | AND Digital fit | Spaceberry Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Large UK enterprise product redesign with an internal capability-building component | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Media or travel-sector digital product delivery at scale | Strong | Limited | AND Digital |
| Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: AND Digital vs Spaceberry Studio
AND Digital (3.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Pairs product delivery for named enterprise clients (British Airways, Condé Nast) with capability-building for the client's own teams, at 1,000+ person UK scale.
Spaceberry Studio (3.6/5) is worth a look if you need AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team. If your situation matches that, Spaceberry Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
AND Digital vs Spaceberry Studio FAQ
Is AND Digital better than Spaceberry Studio?
AND Digital (3.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. AND Digital's strongest advantage: named enterprise client list (British Airways, Condé Nast, The Telegraph, Gousto) demonstrates real delivery scale. Spaceberry Studio's strongest advantage: subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here.
How do AND Digital and Spaceberry Studio differ in pricing?
AND Digital uses enterprise consulting engagement (project-based or retainer) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Spaceberry Studio uses monthly subscription (dedicated designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: AND Digital or Spaceberry Studio?
AND Digital is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between AND Digital and Spaceberry Studio?
AND Digital's primary differentiator is: pairs product delivery for named enterprise clients (British Airways, Condé Nast) with capability-building for the client's own teams, at 1,000+ person UK scale. Spaceberry Studio's primary differentiator is: one of the most accessible entry points in this pool via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. They also differ in team size (1,001–5,000 vs 12–50), minimum engagement (Not published vs $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Consumer products vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.