Frog vs Spaceberry Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Frog (3.8/5) edges ahead of Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) overall. Frog is the better choice for enterprises needing design that covers both digital products and physical/connected hardware in one engagement.. Spaceberry Studio is the stronger option for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Frog vs Spaceberry Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Frog | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1969 | 2016 |
| HQ | San Francisco, CA, USA | Ukraine (also London, UK) |
| Team size | 2,000+ | 12–50 |
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Best for | Enterprises needing design that covers both digital products and physical/connected hardware in one engagement. | Budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract. |
| Pricing model | Project-based, enterprise consulting engagements | Monthly subscription (dedicated designer) |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, Miro | Figma, Framer, Webflow |
| Industries served | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
Frog vs Spaceberry Studio: overview
Frog
Frog's history stretches back to 1969 as Esslinger Design in Germany; it later became frog design and was acquired first by Aricent, then Altran, before landing inside Capgemini Invent in 2019 — an ownership chain worth disclosing. Capgemini has since folded Fahrenheit 212, Idean, and June21 into the frog brand, taking total headcount to roughly 2,000 across 35 studios. Its differentiator: work that spans IoT, smart-home, automotive, and medical devices, not just screens.
Spaceberry Studio
Spaceberry Studio began in 2016 as 'MainCode Agency' before rebranding to Spaceberry in 2020; 2016 is used as the founding year since it's the same continuous team and entity. Based in Ukraine with an additional London, UK location, the company reports 12–50 employees depending on source. It offers subscription-style UI/UX design for SaaS, AI, and mobile apps — one of two subscription comparators in this pool alongside Eleken.
Services and capabilities: Frog vs Spaceberry Studio
| Capability | Frog | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Frog vs Spaceberry Studio
| Framework / platform | Frog | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | ✓ |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | ✓ | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Frog vs Spaceberry Studio
| Criterion | Frog | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Subscription |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Frog vs Spaceberry Studio
| Dimension | Frog | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | IoT and connected hardware product design, Automotive and smart-home interface design | Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription, AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Subscription |
Frog vs Spaceberry Studio: pros and cons
| Frog | |
|---|---|
| + | Rare combined software-plus-physical-hardware design capability in this pool |
| + | 35 global studios support multi-region enterprise programs |
| + | More than five decades of brand history and design case studies |
| + | Access to Capgemini Invent's broader technology-consulting bench |
| - | Operates as a Capgemini Invent brand today, not an independent boutique — worth disclosing to prospective clients |
| - | Absorbed several legacy agencies (Fahrenheit 212, Idean, June21) under one brand, which can mean inconsistent staffing |
| - | Consulting-firm process overhead can slow fast-moving engagements relative to boutique studios |
| Spaceberry Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here |
| + | Focused specifically on SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than spreading thin across many verticals |
| + | London, UK location adds geographic diversification alongside its Ukraine base |
| + | Continuous operation since 2016, spanning its 2020 rebrand from MainCode Agency |
| - | Smallest reported team-size band (12–50) among the boutiques in this pool, limiting capacity for large programs |
| - | Rebranded from MainCode Agency in 2020, so some pre-2020 case studies may appear under the earlier name |
| - | Subscription-only model may not suit clients preferring a single fixed-price contract with a defined end date |
Who should choose Frog?
Frog is the right choice for enterprises needing design that covers both digital products and physical/connected hardware in one engagement..
Combined software-and-hardware design capability (IoT, automotive, medical devices) delivered at Capgemini Invent scale. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Healthcare.
Who should choose Spaceberry Studio?
Spaceberry Studio is the right choice for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract..
One of the most accessible entry points in this pool via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. Minimum engagement starts at $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: Frog vs Spaceberry Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Frog |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Frog (Not published) vs Spaceberry Studio ($4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Frog |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Frog vs Spaceberry Studio
| Use case | Frog fit | Spaceberry Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| IoT and connected hardware product design | Strong | Limited | Frog |
| Automotive and smart-home interface design | Strong | Limited | Frog |
| Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Frog vs Spaceberry Studio
Frog (3.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Combined software-and-hardware design capability (IoT, automotive, medical devices) delivered at Capgemini Invent scale. It is best for enterprises needing design that covers both digital products and physical/connected hardware in one engagement..
Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) is the better choice when budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.. If your situation matches those criteria, Spaceberry Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Frog vs Spaceberry Studio FAQ
Is Frog better than Spaceberry Studio?
Frog (3.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Frog is better for enterprises needing design that covers both digital products and physical/connected hardware in one engagement.. Spaceberry Studio is better for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract..
How do Frog and Spaceberry Studio differ in pricing?
Frog uses project-based, enterprise consulting engagements pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Spaceberry Studio uses monthly subscription (dedicated designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Frog or Spaceberry Studio?
Frog is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Frog and Spaceberry Studio?
Frog's primary differentiator is: combined software-and-hardware design capability (iot, automotive, medical devices) delivered at capgemini invent scale. Spaceberry Studio's primary differentiator is: one of the most accessible entry points in this pool via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. They also differ in team size (2,000+ vs 12–50), minimum engagement (Not published vs $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Consumer products vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.