Spaceberry Studio vs Orbix Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Spaceberry Studio (3.6/5) edges ahead of Orbix Studio (3.5/5) overall. Spaceberry Studio is the better choice for budget-conscious SaaS/AI/mobile teams, low-commitment subscription. Orbix Studio is the stronger option for Seed-to-Series-B startups wanting a young, founder-close team. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Spaceberry Studio vs Orbix Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Spaceberry Studio | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2016 | 2023 |
| HQ | Ukraine (also London, UK) | Queens, NY, USA |
| Team size | 12–50 | 10–30 |
| Rating | 3.6 / 5 | 3.5 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | One of the most accessible entry points in this pool via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract | The newest company in this pool, built specifically around the seed-to-Series-B funded startup stage |
| Pricing model | Monthly subscription (dedicated designer) | Fixed project |
| Min. engagement | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Framer, Webflow | Figma, React, Swift |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare |
Spaceberry Studio vs Orbix Studio: overview
Spaceberry Studio
Spaceberry Studio started in 2016 as 'MainCode Agency,' rebranding to Spaceberry in 2020 — 2016 is used as the founding year here since it's the same continuous team and entity. Based in Ukraine with an additional London office, the company runs 12–50 employees depending on source, selling subscription-style UI/UX design for SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than quoting fixed-price projects — one of two subscription models in this pool alongside Eleken.
Orbix Studio
Every other company in this pool has at least several years of track record; Orbix Studio, launched in 2023 out of Queens, NY, does not, and that's disclosed plainly rather than papered over. The company reports 10–30 employees depending on source and focuses specifically on B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech product design paired with front-end development, aimed at funded startups from seed through Series B — a precise stage-focus that most companies in this pool don't bother to state.
Services and capabilities: Spaceberry Studio vs Orbix Studio
| Capability | Spaceberry Studio | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Spaceberry Studio vs Orbix Studio
| Framework / platform | Spaceberry Studio | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| Framer | ✓ | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Spaceberry Studio vs Orbix Studio
| Criterion | Spaceberry Studio | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) | Not published |
| Engagement models | Subscription | Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Spaceberry Studio vs Orbix Studio
| Dimension | Spaceberry Studio | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription, AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team | Seed-stage B2B SaaS MVP design and front-end build, Fintech product design for a Series A-B startup |
| Typical project type | Subscription | Fixed project |
Spaceberry Studio vs Orbix Studio: pros and cons
| Spaceberry Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here |
| + | Focused specifically on SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than spreading thin across many verticals |
| + | London, UK location adds geographic diversification alongside its Ukraine base |
| + | Continuous operation since 2016, spanning its 2020 rebrand from MainCode Agency |
| - | Smallest reported team-size band (12–50) among the boutiques in this pool, limiting capacity for large programs |
| - | Rebranded from MainCode Agency in 2020, so some pre-2020 case studies may appear under the earlier name |
| - | Subscription-only model may not suit clients preferring a single fixed-price contract with a defined end date |
| Orbix Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Built specifically for funded startups at the seed-through-Series-B stage, a precise positioning few others in this pool share |
| + | Small team size (10–30) means direct founder-to-founder access rather than layered account management |
| + | Combines product design with front-end development, reducing hand-off risk for early-stage teams |
| + | Covers three complex, high-value verticals (B2B SaaS, fintech, healthtech) despite its youth |
| - | Founded in 2023 — by a wide margin the thinnest public track record of any company in this pool |
| - | 10–30 person team caps capacity for large or multi-workstream programs |
| - | Minimum engagement is not published, so budget planning requires a direct conversation |
Who should choose Spaceberry Studio?
A typical fit: ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription.
One of the most accessible entry points in this pool via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. Minimum engagement starts at $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Who should choose Orbix Studio?
A typical fit: seed-stage B2B SaaS MVP design and front-end build.
The newest company in this pool, built specifically around the seed-to-Series-B funded startup stage. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Spaceberry Studio vs Orbix Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Orbix Studio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Spaceberry Studio ($4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)) vs Orbix Studio (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Orbix Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Spaceberry Studio vs Orbix Studio
| Use case | Spaceberry Studio fit | Orbix Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription | Strong | Limited | Spaceberry Studio |
| AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team | Strong | Limited | Spaceberry Studio |
| Seed-stage B2B SaaS MVP design and front-end build | Limited | Strong | Orbix Studio |
| Fintech product design for a Series A-B startup | Limited | Strong | Orbix Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Spaceberry Studio vs Orbix Studio
Spaceberry Studio (3.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. One of the most accessible entry points in this pool via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract.
Orbix Studio (3.5/5) is worth a look if you need fintech product design for a Series A-B startup. If your situation matches that, Orbix Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Spaceberry Studio vs Orbix Studio FAQ
Is Spaceberry Studio better than Orbix Studio?
Spaceberry Studio (3.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Spaceberry Studio's strongest advantage: subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here. Orbix Studio's strongest advantage: built specifically for funded startups at the seed-through-Series-B stage, a precise positioning few others in this pool share.
How do Spaceberry Studio and Orbix Studio differ in pricing?
Spaceberry Studio uses monthly subscription (dedicated designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Orbix Studio uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Spaceberry Studio or Orbix Studio?
Spaceberry Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Spaceberry Studio and Orbix Studio?
Spaceberry Studio's primary differentiator is: one of the most accessible entry points in this pool via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. Orbix Studio's primary differentiator is: the newest company in this pool, built specifically around the seed-to-Series-B funded startup stage. They also differ in team size (12–50 vs 10–30), minimum engagement ($4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs Not published), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products vs SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.