Method vs Spaceberry Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Method (3.7/5) edges ahead of Spaceberry Studio (3.6/5) overall. Method is the better choice for enterprises wanting design-thinking backed by GlobalLogic scale. Spaceberry Studio is the stronger option for budget-conscious SaaS/AI/mobile teams, low-commitment subscription. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Method vs Spaceberry Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Method | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1999 | 2016 |
| HQ | San Francisco, CA, USA (also London and New York) | Ukraine (also London, UK) |
| Team size | Not published (operates within GlobalLogic's global workforce) | 12–50 |
| Rating | 3.7 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A quarter-century of design-thinking work for Google, Comcast, Samsung, and the BBC, now backed by GlobalLogic's engineering scale | One of the most accessible entry points in this pool via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract |
| Pricing model | Enterprise consulting engagement (project-based or retainer) | Monthly subscription (dedicated designer) |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, Design systems/Storybook | Figma, Framer, Webflow |
| Industries served | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
Method vs Spaceberry Studio: overview
Method
Five founders — Kevin Farnham, David Lipkin, Patrick Newbery, Mike Abbink, and Meng Mantasoot — started Method in 1999, building a design and innovation consultancy out of San Francisco with offices in London and New York. GlobalLogic acquired Method in 2011, and in 2021 the firm merged with sister company Skookum, adding offices in Charlotte, Atlanta, and Denver. Method's client list — Google, Comcast, Samsung, Nokia, Microsoft, the BBC, Nissan, Nordstrom — reflects a quarter-century of user-centered design thinking work for large brands.
Spaceberry Studio
Spaceberry Studio started in 2016 as 'MainCode Agency,' rebranding to Spaceberry in 2020 — 2016 is used as the founding year here since it's the same continuous team and entity. Based in Ukraine with an additional London office, the company runs 12–50 employees depending on source, selling subscription-style UI/UX design for SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than quoting fixed-price projects — one of two subscription models in this pool alongside Eleken.
Services and capabilities: Method vs Spaceberry Studio
| Capability | Method | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Method vs Spaceberry Studio
| Framework / platform | Method | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | ✓ |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | ✓ | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Method vs Spaceberry Studio
| Criterion | Method | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer, Dedicated team | Subscription |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Method vs Spaceberry Studio
| Dimension | Method | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Enterprise product design backed by a larger engineering organization, Media or telecom digital product redesign for a large brand | Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription, AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Subscription |
Method vs Spaceberry Studio: pros and cons
| Method | |
|---|---|
| + | Quarter-century client history including Google, Comcast, Samsung, Nokia, Microsoft, and the BBC |
| + | GlobalLogic ownership since 2011 provides access to a much larger engineering organization |
| + | 2021 merger with Skookum added US office presence in Charlotte, Atlanta, and Denver |
| + | Design-thinking-led methodology with a long, publicly documented case-study history |
| - | Acquired by GlobalLogic in 2011 — no longer an independently owned design consultancy |
| - | Team size isn't published separately from GlobalLogic's much larger combined workforce |
| - | Enterprise consulting scale and pricing are less accessible to startups than boutique studios |
| Spaceberry Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here |
| + | Focused specifically on SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than spreading thin across many verticals |
| + | London, UK location adds geographic diversification alongside its Ukraine base |
| + | Continuous operation since 2016, spanning its 2020 rebrand from MainCode Agency |
| - | Smallest reported team-size band (12–50) among the boutiques in this pool, limiting capacity for large programs |
| - | Rebranded from MainCode Agency in 2020, so some pre-2020 case studies may appear under the earlier name |
| - | Subscription-only model may not suit clients preferring a single fixed-price contract with a defined end date |
Who should choose Method?
A typical fit: enterprise product design backed by a larger engineering organization.
A quarter-century of design-thinking work for Google, Comcast, Samsung, and the BBC, now backed by GlobalLogic's engineering scale. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment.
Who should choose Spaceberry Studio?
A typical fit: ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription.
One of the most accessible entry points in this pool via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. Minimum engagement starts at $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: Method vs Spaceberry Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Method |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Method |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Method (Not published) vs Spaceberry Studio ($4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Method |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Method vs Spaceberry Studio
| Use case | Method fit | Spaceberry Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise product design backed by a larger engineering organization | Strong | Limited | Method |
| Media or telecom digital product redesign for a large brand | Strong | Limited | Method |
| Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Method vs Spaceberry Studio
Method (3.7/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A quarter-century of design-thinking work for Google, Comcast, Samsung, and the BBC, now backed by GlobalLogic's engineering scale.
Spaceberry Studio (3.6/5) is worth a look if you need AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team. If your situation matches that, Spaceberry Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Method vs Spaceberry Studio FAQ
Is Method better than Spaceberry Studio?
Method (3.7/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Method's strongest advantage: quarter-century client history including Google, Comcast, Samsung, Nokia, Microsoft, and the BBC. Spaceberry Studio's strongest advantage: subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here.
How do Method and Spaceberry Studio differ in pricing?
Method uses enterprise consulting engagement (project-based or retainer) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Spaceberry Studio uses monthly subscription (dedicated designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Method or Spaceberry Studio?
Spaceberry Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Method and Spaceberry Studio?
Method's primary differentiator is: a quarter-century of design-thinking work for Google, Comcast, Samsung, and the BBC, now backed by GlobalLogic's engineering scale. Spaceberry Studio's primary differentiator is: one of the most accessible entry points in this pool via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. They also differ in team size (Not published (operates within GlobalLogic's global workforce) vs 12–50), minimum engagement (Not published vs $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Consumer products vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.