Method vs AND Digital: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Method (3.7/5) edges ahead of AND Digital (3.6/5) overall. Method is the better choice for enterprises wanting design-thinking backed by GlobalLogic scale. AND Digital is the stronger option for large UK enterprises, design plus team capability-building. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Method vs AND Digital: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Method | AND Digital |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1999 | 2014 |
| HQ | San Francisco, CA, USA (also London and New York) | London, UK (Covent Garden; also Maidenhead and Leeds) |
| Team size | Not published (operates within GlobalLogic's global workforce) | 1,001–5,000 |
| Rating | 3.7 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A quarter-century of design-thinking work for Google, Comcast, Samsung, and the BBC, now backed by GlobalLogic's engineering scale | Pairs product delivery for named enterprise clients (British Airways, Condé Nast) with capability-building for the client's own teams, at 1,000+ person UK scale |
| Pricing model | Enterprise consulting engagement (project-based or retainer) | Enterprise consulting engagement (project-based or retainer) |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, Design systems/Storybook | Figma, React, Design systems/Storybook |
| Industries served | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment |
Method vs AND Digital: overview
Method
Five founders — Kevin Farnham, David Lipkin, Patrick Newbery, Mike Abbink, and Meng Mantasoot — started Method in 1999, building a design and innovation consultancy out of San Francisco with offices in London and New York. GlobalLogic acquired Method in 2011, and in 2021 the firm merged with sister company Skookum, adding offices in Charlotte, Atlanta, and Denver. Method's client list — Google, Comcast, Samsung, Nokia, Microsoft, the BBC, Nissan, Nordstrom — reflects a quarter-century of user-centered design thinking work for large brands.
AND Digital
AND Digital started in London's Covent Garden in 2014, building a product-development-and-team-building consultancy that now runs 1,001–5,000 people across multiple UK offices, including Maidenhead and Leeds. The firm's pitch blends technical delivery with talent development — it doesn't just design and build products for clients like British Airways, Condé Nast, The Telegraph, and Gousto, it also trains client teams to sustain the work afterward.
Services and capabilities: Method vs AND Digital
| Capability | Method | AND Digital |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Method vs AND Digital
| Framework / platform | Method | AND Digital |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | ✓ | ✓ |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Method vs AND Digital
| Criterion | Method | AND Digital |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Retainer, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Method vs AND Digital
| Dimension | Method | AND Digital |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment |
| Best use cases | Enterprise product design backed by a larger engineering organization, Media or telecom digital product redesign for a large brand | Large UK enterprise product redesign with an internal capability-building component, Media or travel-sector digital product delivery at scale |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Method vs AND Digital: pros and cons
| Method | |
|---|---|
| + | Quarter-century client history including Google, Comcast, Samsung, Nokia, Microsoft, and the BBC |
| + | GlobalLogic ownership since 2011 provides access to a much larger engineering organization |
| + | 2021 merger with Skookum added US office presence in Charlotte, Atlanta, and Denver |
| + | Design-thinking-led methodology with a long, publicly documented case-study history |
| - | Acquired by GlobalLogic in 2011 — no longer an independently owned design consultancy |
| - | Team size isn't published separately from GlobalLogic's much larger combined workforce |
| - | Enterprise consulting scale and pricing are less accessible to startups than boutique studios |
| AND Digital | |
|---|---|
| + | Named enterprise client list (British Airways, Condé Nast, The Telegraph, Gousto) demonstrates real delivery scale |
| + | 1,001–5,000 employees give it significant UK delivery capacity |
| + | Combines product delivery with training the client's own team, not just a hand-off at project end |
| + | Multiple UK office locations (London, Maidenhead, Leeds) support regional delivery |
| - | UK-concentrated office footprint offers less multi-region coverage than global agency networks |
| - | Large consultancy scale and pricing are less accessible to startups than boutique studios |
| - | Talent-development-plus-delivery positioning means less singular focus on pure design than product-design-only specialists |
Who should choose Method?
A typical fit: enterprise product design backed by a larger engineering organization.
A quarter-century of design-thinking work for Google, Comcast, Samsung, and the BBC, now backed by GlobalLogic's engineering scale. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment.
Who should choose AND Digital?
A typical fit: large UK enterprise product redesign with an internal capability-building component.
Pairs product delivery for named enterprise clients (British Airways, Condé Nast) with capability-building for the client's own teams, at 1,000+ person UK scale. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment.
Decision matrix: Method vs AND Digital
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Method |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Method |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Method (Not published) vs AND Digital (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Method |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Method vs AND Digital
| Use case | Method fit | AND Digital fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise product design backed by a larger engineering organization | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Media or telecom digital product redesign for a large brand | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Large UK enterprise product redesign with an internal capability-building component | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Media or travel-sector digital product delivery at scale | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Method vs AND Digital
Method (3.7/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A quarter-century of design-thinking work for Google, Comcast, Samsung, and the BBC, now backed by GlobalLogic's engineering scale.
AND Digital (3.6/5) is worth a look if you need media or travel-sector digital product delivery at scale. If your situation matches that, AND Digital is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Method vs AND Digital FAQ
Is Method better than AND Digital?
Method (3.7/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Method's strongest advantage: quarter-century client history including Google, Comcast, Samsung, Nokia, Microsoft, and the BBC. AND Digital's strongest advantage: named enterprise client list (British Airways, Condé Nast, The Telegraph, Gousto) demonstrates real delivery scale.
How do Method and AND Digital differ in pricing?
Method uses enterprise consulting engagement (project-based or retainer) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. AND Digital uses enterprise consulting engagement (project-based or retainer) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Method or AND Digital?
AND Digital is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Method and AND Digital?
Method's primary differentiator is: a quarter-century of design-thinking work for Google, Comcast, Samsung, and the BBC, now backed by GlobalLogic's engineering scale. AND Digital's primary differentiator is: pairs product delivery for named enterprise clients (British Airways, Condé Nast) with capability-building for the client's own teams, at 1,000+ person UK scale. They also differ in team size (Not published (operates within GlobalLogic's global workforce) vs 1,001–5,000), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Consumer products vs Enterprise transformation, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.