Excited vs UX studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Excited (4.5/5) edges ahead of UX studio (4.1/5) overall. Excited is the better choice for SaaS/fintech teams, Clutch-ranked specialist, accessible rates. UX studio is the stronger option for complex B2B SaaS teams, research-first before UI. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Excited vs UX studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Excited | UX studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 | 2013 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine | Budapest, Hungary |
| Team size | 100+ | 60–71 |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A sustained Top 5 global UX company ranking on Clutch, with about 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity | A research-first methodology comparable in rigor to Phenomenon Studio's own discovery-first approach, applied specifically to complex B2B SaaS products |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Framer, After Effects | Figma, Dovetail, Maze |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech | SaaS / B2B software |
Excited vs UX studio: overview
Excited
Excited opened in Lviv, Ukraine in 2018 and has grown to 100+ designers, holding a repeated spot among Clutch's Top 5 UX companies worldwide. About 70% of its Clutch reviewers specifically call out quality and creativity, an unusually direct signal in review data. The company deliberately narrows to SaaS and fintech clients, covering UX/UI, product design, branding, and motion design, with delivery experience across 20+ countries.
UX studio
David Pasztor founded UX studio in Budapest, Hungary in 2013; the team has since grown to 60–71 people depending on source. The company's entire practice is structured around research coming first, applied specifically to B2B SaaS products complex enough that jumping straight to interface design would be a mistake — a methodology genuinely comparable in rigor to Phenomenon Studio's own discovery-first approach.
Services and capabilities: Excited vs UX studio
| Capability | Excited | UX studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Excited vs UX studio
| Framework / platform | Excited | UX studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| Framer | ✓ | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Excited vs UX studio
| Criterion | Excited | UX studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Excited vs UX studio
| Dimension | Excited | UX studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech | SaaS / B2B software |
| Best use cases | SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company, Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish | Complex B2B SaaS product research and redesign, Discovery-phase UX research before a full product build |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Excited vs UX studio: pros and cons
| Excited | |
|---|---|
| + | Sustained Top 5 UX company ranking worldwide by Clutch, not a one-off placement |
| + | About 70% of Clutch reviewers specifically cite quality and creativity, a strong qualitative signal |
| + | Purpose-built around SaaS and fintech, giving real vertical depth |
| + | Delivery experience across 20+ countries demonstrates broad operational reach |
| - | The claimed 15M+ user reach figure is self-reported and independently unverifiable |
| - | Ukraine-based team carries the same regional-continuity considerations as other Ukraine-rooted companies |
| - | SaaS/fintech specialization means less fit outside those two verticals |
| UX studio | |
|---|---|
| + | A genuine research-first specialty, evidenced by the company's own published case studies, not just marketing copy |
| + | Over a decade of continuous operation (since 2013) under its founding team |
| + | Focused specifically on B2B SaaS, giving real depth in untangling complex product workflows |
| + | 60–71 person team is large enough for multi-workstream engagements while staying boutique in culture |
| - | Exclusive B2B SaaS focus means less fit for consumer, healthcare, or fintech-specific projects |
| - | The research-first approach can extend project timelines for clients wanting to move straight to UI |
| - | $20K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) is mid-tier, not the cheapest option here |
Who should choose Excited?
A typical fit: SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company.
A sustained Top 5 global UX company ranking on Clutch, with about 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech.
Who should choose UX studio?
A typical fit: complex B2B SaaS product research and redesign.
A research-first methodology comparable in rigor to Phenomenon Studio's own discovery-first approach, applied specifically to complex B2B SaaS products. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software.
Decision matrix: Excited vs UX studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Excited |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Excited |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Excited |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Excited |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Excited vs UX studio
| Use case | Excited fit | UX studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish | Strong | Limited | Excited |
| Complex B2B SaaS product research and redesign | Limited | Strong | UX studio |
| Discovery-phase UX research before a full product build | Limited | Strong | UX studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Excited vs UX studio
Excited (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A sustained Top 5 global UX company ranking on Clutch, with about 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity.
UX studio (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need discovery-phase UX research before a full product build. If your situation matches that, UX studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Excited vs UX studio FAQ
Is Excited better than UX studio?
Excited (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Excited's strongest advantage: sustained Top 5 UX company ranking worldwide by Clutch, not a one-off placement. UX studio's strongest advantage: a genuine research-first specialty, evidenced by the company's own published case studies, not just marketing copy.
How do Excited and UX studio differ in pricing?
Excited uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). UX studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Excited or UX studio?
UX studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Excited and UX studio?
Excited's primary differentiator is: a sustained Top 5 global UX company ranking on Clutch, with about 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity. UX studio's primary differentiator is: a research-first methodology comparable in rigor to Phenomenon Studio's own discovery-first approach, applied specifically to complex B2B SaaS products. They also differ in team size (100+ vs 60–71), minimum engagement ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs SaaS / B2B software).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.