Phenomenon Studio vs Excited: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: July 2026
Quick verdict
Phenomenon Studio (4.8/5) edges ahead of Excited (4.6/5) overall. Phenomenon Studio is the better choice for companies whose brand, website, or product has outgrown its current design and need one senior team to own the full rebuild — from strategy through post-launch.. Excited is the stronger option for saaS and fintech product teams wanting a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency rates.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Phenomenon Studio vs Excited: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Phenomenon Studio | Excited |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2019 | 2018 |
| HQ | Europe (entities in the USA, Estonia, and Switzerland) | Lviv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 70+ | 100+ |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 |
| Best for | Companies whose brand, website, or product has outgrown its current design and need one senior team to own the full rebuild — from strategy through post-launch. | SaaS and fintech product teams wanting a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency rates. |
| Pricing model | Project-based, full-cycle engagements (fixed scope or retainer — not published; contact for quote) | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Webflow, React | Figma, Framer, After Effects |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech |
Phenomenon Studio vs Excited: overview
Phenomenon Studio
Founded in 2019, Phenomenon Studio is a boutique product design and development company built for a specific situation: a business that has evolved past the brand, website, or product it launched with. Instead of splitting strategy, design, development, and post-launch support across separate vendors, Phenomenon runs all four phases through one senior team. That team — 70+ specialists based in Europe, with legal entities in the USA, Estonia, and Switzerland — works across SaaS, fintech, healthcare, and EdTech, and has shipped 120+ products for clients that have collectively raised over $500M.
Excited
Excited started in 2018 out of Lviv, Ukraine and has grown to 100+ designers, with Clutch consistently ranking it among the Top 5 UX companies globally — roughly 70% of its reviewers cite quality and creativity by name. Its work covers UX/UI, product design, branding, and motion design, aimed squarely at SaaS and fintech, with delivery across 20+ countries and a self-reported reach of 15M+ product users (per company; independently unverifiable exact reach figure).
Services and capabilities: Phenomenon Studio vs Excited
| Capability | Phenomenon Studio | Excited |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Phenomenon Studio vs Excited
| Framework / platform | Phenomenon Studio | Excited |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | N/A |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | ✓ |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Phenomenon Studio vs Excited
| Criterion | Phenomenon Studio | Excited |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Phenomenon Studio vs Excited
| Dimension | Phenomenon Studio | Excited |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech |
| Best use cases | Redesigning a SaaS platform ahead of a funding round, Rebuilding a fintech or healthcare product to modern, compliant UX standards | SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company, Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Phenomenon Studio vs Excited: pros and cons
| Phenomenon Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0 Clutch rating with Top 1000 Company 2025 and Top Design Company USA 2026 recognitions |
| + | Compliancy Group-verified HIPAA compliance, unusual among boutique product design companies |
| + | Nielsen Norman Group UX Certification and a four-tier Webflow Experts partnership |
| + | Single team ownership from strategy through post-launch removes the hand-off risk of splitting vendors |
| + | Roughly half of clients return for a second project |
| + | 120+ launched products behind a combined $500M+ in client fundraising |
| - | The discovery-first process takes more time upfront, which can feel slow to clients wanting to start building immediately |
| - | Does not offer product or growth marketing — a separate agency is needed for post-launch growth work |
| - | No public rate card; a discovery call is required for any project-specific quote |
| Excited | |
|---|---|
| + | Repeated Top 5 UX company ranking worldwide by Clutch, not a one-off placement |
| + | Roughly 70% of Clutch reviewers specifically cite quality/creativity, a strong qualitative signal |
| + | Purpose-built around SaaS and fintech, giving real vertical depth |
| + | Delivery experience across 20+ countries demonstrates broad operational reach |
| - | The 15M+ user reach figure is self-reported and independently unverifiable |
| - | Ukraine-based team carries the same regional-continuity considerations as other Ukraine-rooted companies |
| - | SaaS/fintech specialization means less fit outside those two verticals |
Who should choose Phenomenon Studio?
Phenomenon Studio is the right choice for companies whose brand, website, or product has outgrown its current design and need one senior team to own the full rebuild — from strategy through post-launch..
A 5.0 Clutch rating, HIPAA compliance, and NN/g certification, behind 120+ shipped products and $500M+ in client fundraising. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech.
Who should choose Excited?
Excited is the right choice for saaS and fintech product teams wanting a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency rates..
A repeat Clutch Top-5 global UX ranking, with roughly 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech.
Decision matrix: Phenomenon Studio vs Excited
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Phenomenon Studio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Phenomenon Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Phenomenon Studio (Not published) vs Excited ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Phenomenon Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Phenomenon Studio vs Excited
| Use case | Phenomenon Studio fit | Excited fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Redesigning a SaaS platform ahead of a funding round | Strong | Limited | Phenomenon Studio |
| Rebuilding a fintech or healthcare product to modern, compliant UX standards | Strong | Limited | Phenomenon Studio |
| SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Phenomenon Studio vs Excited
Phenomenon Studio (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A 5.0 Clutch rating, HIPAA compliance, and NN/g certification, behind 120+ shipped products and $500M+ in client fundraising. It is best for companies whose brand, website, or product has outgrown its current design and need one senior team to own the full rebuild — from strategy through post-launch..
Excited (4.6/5) is the better choice when saaS and fintech product teams wanting a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency rates.. If your situation matches those criteria, Excited is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Phenomenon Studio vs Excited FAQ
Is Phenomenon Studio better than Excited?
Phenomenon Studio (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Phenomenon Studio is better for companies whose brand, website, or product has outgrown its current design and need one senior team to own the full rebuild — from strategy through post-launch.. Excited is better for saaS and fintech product teams wanting a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency rates..
How do Phenomenon Studio and Excited differ in pricing?
Phenomenon Studio uses project-based, full-cycle engagements (fixed scope or retainer — not published; contact for quote) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Excited uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Phenomenon Studio or Excited?
Excited is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Phenomenon Studio and Excited?
Phenomenon Studio's primary differentiator is: a 5.0 clutch rating, hipaa compliance, and nn/g certification, behind 120+ shipped products and $500m+ in client fundraising. Excited's primary differentiator is: a repeat clutch top-5 global ux ranking, with roughly 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity. They also differ in team size (70+ vs 100+), minimum engagement (Not published vs $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech).
Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.