ANML vs Spaceberry Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
ANML (3.7/5) edges ahead of Spaceberry Studio (3.6/5) overall. ANML is the better choice for B2B, healthcare, AI startups wanting a small senior team. Spaceberry Studio is the stronger option for budget-conscious SaaS/AI/mobile teams, low-commitment subscription. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
ANML vs Spaceberry Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | ANML | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2012 | 2016 |
| HQ | United States (specific city not published) | Ukraine (also London, UK) |
| Team size | ~10 (per LinkedIn) | 12–50 |
| Rating | 3.7 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | One of the smallest teams in this pool, offering the highest senior-to-client ratio for B2B, healthcare, and AI work | One of the most accessible entry points in this pool via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract |
| Pricing model | Fixed project | Monthly subscription (dedicated designer) |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Sketch | Figma, Framer, Webflow |
| Industries served | Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
ANML vs Spaceberry Studio: overview
ANML
ANML (Animal) has operated since 2012 with a team so small — LinkedIn lists roughly 10 employees — that it barely registers next to the enterprise names in this pool. No specific HQ city appears in available sources, so it's treated here simply as US-based. The trade-off for that scale is direct access: clients work with senior people from day one, on a deliberately narrow set of engagements concentrated in B2B, healthcare, and AI.
Spaceberry Studio
Spaceberry Studio started in 2016 as 'MainCode Agency,' rebranding to Spaceberry in 2020 — 2016 is used as the founding year here since it's the same continuous team and entity. Based in Ukraine with an additional London office, the company runs 12–50 employees depending on source, selling subscription-style UI/UX design for SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than quoting fixed-price projects — one of two subscription models in this pool alongside Eleken.
Services and capabilities: ANML vs Spaceberry Studio
| Capability | ANML | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: ANML vs Spaceberry Studio
| Framework / platform | ANML | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | ✓ |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: ANML vs Spaceberry Studio
| Criterion | ANML | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project | Subscription |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: ANML vs Spaceberry Studio
| Dimension | ANML | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | B2B SaaS product design for a small, senior team, Healthcare product UX with a boutique company | Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription, AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Subscription |
ANML vs Spaceberry Studio: pros and cons
| ANML | |
|---|---|
| + | 13 years of continuous operation since 2012 |
| + | Very small (~10 person) team means direct access to senior designers on every project |
| + | Focused specifically on B2B, healthcare, and AI rather than spreading across unrelated verticals |
| + | Boutique scale keeps overhead — and likely pricing — lower than mid-size companies |
| - | HQ city is not explicitly published in available sources, making delivery-location verification harder |
| - | A ~10-person team caps capacity for large or multi-workstream programs |
| - | Minimum engagement is not published, so budget planning requires a direct conversation |
| Spaceberry Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here |
| + | Focused specifically on SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than spreading thin across many verticals |
| + | London, UK location adds geographic diversification alongside its Ukraine base |
| + | Continuous operation since 2016, spanning its 2020 rebrand from MainCode Agency |
| - | Smallest reported team-size band (12–50) among the boutiques in this pool, limiting capacity for large programs |
| - | Rebranded from MainCode Agency in 2020, so some pre-2020 case studies may appear under the earlier name |
| - | Subscription-only model may not suit clients preferring a single fixed-price contract with a defined end date |
Who should choose ANML?
A typical fit: B2B SaaS product design for a small, senior team.
One of the smallest teams in this pool, offering the highest senior-to-client ratio for B2B, healthcare, and AI work. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software.
Who should choose Spaceberry Studio?
A typical fit: ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription.
One of the most accessible entry points in this pool via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. Minimum engagement starts at $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: ANML vs Spaceberry Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | ANML |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: ANML (Not published) vs Spaceberry Studio ($4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | ANML |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: ANML vs Spaceberry Studio
| Use case | ANML fit | Spaceberry Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| B2B SaaS product design for a small, senior team | Strong | Limited | ANML |
| Healthcare product UX with a boutique company | Strong | Limited | ANML |
| Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: ANML vs Spaceberry Studio
ANML (3.7/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. One of the smallest teams in this pool, offering the highest senior-to-client ratio for B2B, healthcare, and AI work.
Spaceberry Studio (3.6/5) is worth a look if you need AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team. If your situation matches that, Spaceberry Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
ANML vs Spaceberry Studio FAQ
Is ANML better than Spaceberry Studio?
ANML (3.7/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. ANML's strongest advantage: 13 years of continuous operation since 2012. Spaceberry Studio's strongest advantage: subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here.
How do ANML and Spaceberry Studio differ in pricing?
ANML uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Spaceberry Studio uses monthly subscription (dedicated designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: ANML or Spaceberry Studio?
Spaceberry Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between ANML and Spaceberry Studio?
ANML's primary differentiator is: one of the smallest teams in this pool, offering the highest senior-to-client ratio for B2B, healthcare, and AI work. Spaceberry Studio's primary differentiator is: one of the most accessible entry points in this pool via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. They also differ in team size (~10 (per LinkedIn) vs 12–50), minimum engagement (Not published vs $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.