AND Digital vs UXDA: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
UXDA (4.2/5) edges ahead of AND Digital (3.6/5) overall. UXDA is the better choice for banks and fintech, exclusively financial-services UX. AND Digital is the stronger option for large UK enterprises, design plus team capability-building. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
AND Digital vs UXDA: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | AND Digital | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
| HQ | London, UK (Covent Garden; also Maidenhead and Leeds) | Riga, Latvia |
| Team size | 1,001–5,000 | 25+ |
| Rating | 3.6 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Pairs product delivery for named enterprise clients (British Airways, Condé Nast) with capability-building for the client's own teams, at 1,000+ person UK scale | The only company in this pool exclusively focused on financial services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries |
| Pricing model | Enterprise consulting engagement (project-based or retainer) | Fixed project, retainer |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Design systems/Storybook | Figma, Sketch, Design systems/Storybook |
| Industries served | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment | Financial services / fintech |
AND Digital vs UXDA: overview
AND Digital
AND Digital started in London's Covent Garden in 2014, building a product-development-and-team-building consultancy that now runs 1,001–5,000 people across multiple UK offices, including Maidenhead and Leeds. The firm's pitch blends technical delivery with talent development — it doesn't just design and build products for clients like British Airways, Condé Nast, The Telegraph, and Gousto, it also trains client teams to sustain the work afterward.
UXDA
Alex Kreger and co-founder Linda launched UXDA (Financial UX Design) in 2015, keeping the team small and specific — 25+ multidisciplinary specialists in Riga, Latvia. A decade later, that focus has produced 150+ banking and fintech digital platforms defined or governed across 39 countries. There's no branding or consumer-product work to point to here, which is exactly the point: every engagement is financial-services UX, making UXDA the clearest single-vertical fintech specialist in this pool.
Services and capabilities: AND Digital vs UXDA
| Capability | AND Digital | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: AND Digital vs UXDA
| Framework / platform | AND Digital | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | ✓ | ✓ |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: AND Digital vs UXDA
| Criterion | AND Digital | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Retainer |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: AND Digital vs UXDA
| Dimension | AND Digital | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment | Financial services / fintech |
| Best use cases | Large UK enterprise product redesign with an internal capability-building component, Media or travel-sector digital product delivery at scale | Bank digital platform redesign, Fintech app UX for a regulated market |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
AND Digital vs UXDA: pros and cons
| AND Digital | |
|---|---|
| + | Named enterprise client list (British Airways, Condé Nast, The Telegraph, Gousto) demonstrates real delivery scale |
| + | 1,001–5,000 employees give it significant UK delivery capacity |
| + | Combines product delivery with training the client's own team, not just a hand-off at project end |
| + | Multiple UK office locations (London, Maidenhead, Leeds) support regional delivery |
| - | UK-concentrated office footprint offers less multi-region coverage than global agency networks |
| - | Large consultancy scale and pricing are less accessible to startups than boutique studios |
| - | Talent-development-plus-delivery positioning means less singular focus on pure design than product-design-only specialists |
| UXDA | |
|---|---|
| + | Exclusive financial-services focus gives it domain expertise generalist companies simply can't match |
| + | 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries over a decade |
| + | Small, senior 25+ team keeps client relationships direct rather than layered through account management |
| + | A decade of continuous, single-vertical operation compounds domain knowledge over time |
| - | The exclusive fintech focus is a real limitation for any client outside financial services |
| - | $30K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) runs higher than most 25-person boutiques |
| - | Small team size (25+) caps capacity for very large, multi-workstream programs |
Who should choose AND Digital?
A typical fit: large UK enterprise product redesign with an internal capability-building component.
Pairs product delivery for named enterprise clients (British Airways, Condé Nast) with capability-building for the client's own teams, at 1,000+ person UK scale. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment.
Who should choose UXDA?
A typical fit: bank digital platform redesign.
The only company in this pool exclusively focused on financial services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. Minimum engagement starts at $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech.
Decision matrix: AND Digital vs UXDA
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | AND Digital |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | AND Digital |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: AND Digital (Not published) vs UXDA ($30K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | AND Digital |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: AND Digital vs UXDA
| Use case | AND Digital fit | UXDA fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Large UK enterprise product redesign with an internal capability-building component | Strong | Limited | AND Digital |
| Media or travel-sector digital product delivery at scale | Strong | Limited | AND Digital |
| Bank digital platform redesign | Limited | Strong | UXDA |
| Fintech app UX for a regulated market | Limited | Strong | UXDA |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: AND Digital vs UXDA
UXDA (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. The only company in this pool exclusively focused on financial services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries.
AND Digital (3.6/5) is worth a look if you need media or travel-sector digital product delivery at scale. If your situation matches that, AND Digital is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
AND Digital vs UXDA FAQ
Is AND Digital better than UXDA?
UXDA (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. AND Digital's strongest advantage: named enterprise client list (British Airways, Condé Nast, The Telegraph, Gousto) demonstrates real delivery scale. UXDA's strongest advantage: exclusive financial-services focus gives it domain expertise generalist companies simply can't match.
How do AND Digital and UXDA differ in pricing?
AND Digital uses enterprise consulting engagement (project-based or retainer) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. UXDA uses fixed project, retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: AND Digital or UXDA?
AND Digital is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between AND Digital and UXDA?
AND Digital's primary differentiator is: pairs product delivery for named enterprise clients (British Airways, Condé Nast) with capability-building for the client's own teams, at 1,000+ person UK scale. UXDA's primary differentiator is: the only company in this pool exclusively focused on financial services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. They also differ in team size (1,001–5,000 vs 25+), minimum engagement (Not published vs $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Consumer products vs Financial services / fintech).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.