ustwo vs Spaceberry Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
ustwo (4.2/5) edges ahead of Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) overall. ustwo is the better choice for enterprise and consumer product teams wanting a company with two decades of continuous, independent operation.. Spaceberry Studio is the stronger option for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
ustwo vs Spaceberry Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | ustwo | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2004 | 2016 |
| HQ | London, UK | Ukraine (also London, UK) |
| Team size | ~260 | 12–50 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Best for | Enterprise and consumer product teams wanting a company with two decades of continuous, independent operation. | Budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Monthly subscription (dedicated designer) |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Sketch, Swift | Figma, Framer, Webflow |
| Industries served | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
ustwo vs Spaceberry Studio: overview
ustwo
Matt Miller and John Sinclair started ustwo in Shoreditch, London in November 2004; five studio locations later (London, New York, Malmö, Tokyo, Lisbon), the company employs around 260 people (as of 2022). Early enterprise clients Sony Ericsson and JPMorgan sit alongside a rarer credential: ustwo's own award-winning game, Monument Valley, demonstrates consumer product craft through self-published IP rather than only client work.
Spaceberry Studio
Spaceberry Studio began in 2016 as 'MainCode Agency' before rebranding to Spaceberry in 2020; 2016 is used as the founding year since it's the same continuous team and entity. Based in Ukraine with an additional London, UK location, the company reports 12–50 employees depending on source. It offers subscription-style UI/UX design for SaaS, AI, and mobile apps — one of two subscription comparators in this pool alongside Eleken.
Services and capabilities: ustwo vs Spaceberry Studio
| Capability | ustwo | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: ustwo vs Spaceberry Studio
| Framework / platform | ustwo | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | ✓ |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: ustwo vs Spaceberry Studio
| Criterion | ustwo | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Subscription |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: ustwo vs Spaceberry Studio
| Dimension | ustwo | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Enterprise financial services app design, Consumer mobile product design and development | Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription, AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Subscription |
ustwo vs Spaceberry Studio: pros and cons
| ustwo | |
|---|---|
| + | Two decades of continuous, independently-owned operation since 2004 |
| + | Studios across five cities (London, New York, Malmö, Tokyo, Lisbon) |
| + | A rare combination of enterprise client work and its own consumer product craft |
| + | 260-person team large enough for multi-stream engagements while staying boutique in culture |
| - | Published team-size figure dates to 2022; no more recent public number is available |
| - | General digital product positioning offers less vertical specialization than fintech- or healthcare-only boutiques |
| - | No published minimum engagement makes early budget planning harder |
| Spaceberry Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here |
| + | Focused specifically on SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than spreading thin across many verticals |
| + | London, UK location adds geographic diversification alongside its Ukraine base |
| + | Continuous operation since 2016, spanning its 2020 rebrand from MainCode Agency |
| - | Smallest reported team-size band (12–50) among the boutiques in this pool, limiting capacity for large programs |
| - | Rebranded from MainCode Agency in 2020, so some pre-2020 case studies may appear under the earlier name |
| - | Subscription-only model may not suit clients preferring a single fixed-price contract with a defined end date |
Who should choose ustwo?
ustwo is the right choice for enterprise and consumer product teams wanting a company with two decades of continuous, independent operation..
Pairs enterprise client work (JPMorgan) with self-published consumer product craft, proven through its own game Monument Valley. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Enterprise transformation.
Who should choose Spaceberry Studio?
Spaceberry Studio is the right choice for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract..
One of the most accessible entry points in this pool via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. Minimum engagement starts at $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: ustwo vs Spaceberry Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | ustwo |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | ustwo |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: ustwo (Not published) vs Spaceberry Studio ($4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | ustwo |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: ustwo vs Spaceberry Studio
| Use case | ustwo fit | Spaceberry Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise financial services app design | Strong | Limited | ustwo |
| Consumer mobile product design and development | Strong | Limited | ustwo |
| Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: ustwo vs Spaceberry Studio
ustwo (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Pairs enterprise client work (JPMorgan) with self-published consumer product craft, proven through its own game Monument Valley. It is best for enterprise and consumer product teams wanting a company with two decades of continuous, independent operation..
Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) is the better choice when budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.. If your situation matches those criteria, Spaceberry Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
ustwo vs Spaceberry Studio FAQ
Is ustwo better than Spaceberry Studio?
ustwo (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. ustwo is better for enterprise and consumer product teams wanting a company with two decades of continuous, independent operation.. Spaceberry Studio is better for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract..
How do ustwo and Spaceberry Studio differ in pricing?
ustwo uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Spaceberry Studio uses monthly subscription (dedicated designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: ustwo or Spaceberry Studio?
Spaceberry Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between ustwo and Spaceberry Studio?
ustwo's primary differentiator is: pairs enterprise client work (jpmorgan) with self-published consumer product craft, proven through its own game monument valley. Spaceberry Studio's primary differentiator is: one of the most accessible entry points in this pool via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. They also differ in team size (~260 vs 12–50), minimum engagement (Not published vs $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Consumer products, Enterprise transformation vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.