Qubstudio vs Orbix Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Qubstudio (4.5/5) edges ahead of Orbix Studio (3.5/5) overall. Qubstudio is the better choice for Fintech, logistics, healthcare — MVP to enterprise redesign. Orbix Studio is the stronger option for Seed-to-Series-B startups wanting a young, founder-close team. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Qubstudio vs Orbix Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Qubstudio | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2006 | 2023 |
| HQ | London, UK (Canary Wharf), Ukraine-based delivery team | Queens, NY, USA |
| Team size | 51–200 (company states ~70 creative professionals) | 10–30 |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 3.5 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Currently Clutch's #1-ranked UX/UI company worldwide for 2026, with Red Dot Design Award recognition layered on top | The newest company in this pool, built specifically around the seed-to-Series-B funded startup stage |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project |
| Min. engagement | $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Sketch, Webflow | Figma, React, Swift |
| Industries served | Financial services / fintech, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare |
Qubstudio vs Orbix Studio: overview
Qubstudio
Qubstudio's exact founding year sits somewhere around 2006 or 2007 depending on the source, but its current standing is unambiguous: Clutch ranked it the #1 UX/UI company of 2026 across 90+ reviews. The company runs from London's Canary Wharf with a Ukraine-based delivery team, stating roughly 70 creative professionals inside a broader 51–200 employee band reported by directories. Red Dot Design Award and UX Design Awards recognition sit alongside the Clutch ranking, and its client work covers fintech, logistics, healthcare, and EdTech.
Orbix Studio
Every other company in this pool has at least several years of track record; Orbix Studio, launched in 2023 out of Queens, NY, does not, and that's disclosed plainly rather than papered over. The company reports 10–30 employees depending on source and focuses specifically on B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech product design paired with front-end development, aimed at funded startups from seed through Series B — a precise stage-focus that most companies in this pool don't bother to state.
Services and capabilities: Qubstudio vs Orbix Studio
| Capability | Qubstudio | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Qubstudio vs Orbix Studio
| Framework / platform | Qubstudio | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | N/A |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Qubstudio vs Orbix Studio
| Criterion | Qubstudio | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Qubstudio vs Orbix Studio
| Dimension | Qubstudio | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services / fintech, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | Fintech MVP launch design, Logistics platform UX overhaul | Seed-stage B2B SaaS MVP design and front-end build, Fintech product design for a Series A-B startup |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Qubstudio vs Orbix Studio: pros and cons
| Qubstudio | |
|---|---|
| + | Currently ranked #1 UX/UI company on Clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ public reviews |
| + | Independently verified via Red Dot Design Award and UX Design Awards recognition |
| + | Nearly two decades of operation with a stable London HQ and Ukraine delivery team |
| + | Covers everything from MVP launches to enterprise digital transformation |
| - | Founding year is disputed between sources (2006 vs. 2007) — treated as approximate |
| - | Ukraine-based delivery team carries the same regional-continuity considerations as other Ukraine-rooted companies |
| - | The 51–200 directory band is wide; the company's own ~70 figure is more precise but self-reported |
| Orbix Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Built specifically for funded startups at the seed-through-Series-B stage, a precise positioning few others in this pool share |
| + | Small team size (10–30) means direct founder-to-founder access rather than layered account management |
| + | Combines product design with front-end development, reducing hand-off risk for early-stage teams |
| + | Covers three complex, high-value verticals (B2B SaaS, fintech, healthtech) despite its youth |
| - | Founded in 2023 — by a wide margin the thinnest public track record of any company in this pool |
| - | 10–30 person team caps capacity for large or multi-workstream programs |
| - | Minimum engagement is not published, so budget planning requires a direct conversation |
Who should choose Qubstudio?
A typical fit: fintech MVP launch design.
Currently Clutch's #1-ranked UX/UI company worldwide for 2026, with Red Dot Design Award recognition layered on top. Minimum engagement starts at $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, Healthcare.
Who should choose Orbix Studio?
A typical fit: seed-stage B2B SaaS MVP design and front-end build.
The newest company in this pool, built specifically around the seed-to-Series-B funded startup stage. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Qubstudio vs Orbix Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Qubstudio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Qubstudio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Qubstudio ($15K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) vs Orbix Studio (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Orbix Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Qubstudio vs Orbix Studio
| Use case | Qubstudio fit | Orbix Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fintech MVP launch design | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Logistics platform UX overhaul | Strong | Limited | Qubstudio |
| Seed-stage B2B SaaS MVP design and front-end build | Limited | Strong | Orbix Studio |
| Fintech product design for a Series A-B startup | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Qubstudio vs Orbix Studio
Qubstudio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Currently Clutch's #1-ranked UX/UI company worldwide for 2026, with Red Dot Design Award recognition layered on top.
Orbix Studio (3.5/5) is worth a look if you need fintech product design for a Series A-B startup. If your situation matches that, Orbix Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Qubstudio vs Orbix Studio FAQ
Is Qubstudio better than Orbix Studio?
Qubstudio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Qubstudio's strongest advantage: currently ranked #1 UX/UI company on Clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ public reviews. Orbix Studio's strongest advantage: built specifically for funded startups at the seed-through-Series-B stage, a precise positioning few others in this pool share.
How do Qubstudio and Orbix Studio differ in pricing?
Qubstudio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Orbix Studio uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Qubstudio or Orbix Studio?
Qubstudio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Qubstudio and Orbix Studio?
Qubstudio's primary differentiator is: currently Clutch's #1-ranked UX/UI company worldwide for 2026, with Red Dot Design Award recognition layered on top. Orbix Studio's primary differentiator is: the newest company in this pool, built specifically around the seed-to-Series-B funded startup stage. They also differ in team size (51–200 (company states ~70 creative professionals) vs 10–30), minimum engagement ($15K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services / fintech, Healthcare vs SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.