Fireart Studio vs Orbix Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Fireart Studio (4.3/5) edges ahead of Orbix Studio (3.5/5) overall. Fireart Studio is the better choice for Startups/mid-market, design plus full software development. Orbix Studio is the stronger option for Seed-to-Series-B startups wanting a young, founder-close team. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Fireart Studio vs Orbix Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Fireart Studio | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2023 |
| HQ | Warsaw, Poland (Ukraine-founded roots) | Queens, NY, USA |
| Team size | 100–150+ | 10–30 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.5 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients, backed by Clutch's independently verified 'Leading UX Design Team' recognition | The newest company in this pool, built specifically around the seed-to-Series-B funded startup stage |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team, T&M | Fixed project |
| Min. engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Next.js | Figma, React, Swift |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare |
Fireart Studio vs Orbix Studio: overview
Fireart Studio
Fireart Studio began in 2013 with Ukrainian roots and now runs out of Warsaw, Poland, scaling from a single founder to 150+ people over twelve years. Clutch names it a 'Leading UX Design Team'; DesignRush and The Manifest have separately called it a Top Graphic Design Company. The track record behind those recognitions: 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients, with product design and full software development handled by the same boutique team.
Orbix Studio
Every other company in this pool has at least several years of track record; Orbix Studio, launched in 2023 out of Queens, NY, does not, and that's disclosed plainly rather than papered over. The company reports 10–30 employees depending on source and focuses specifically on B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech product design paired with front-end development, aimed at funded startups from seed through Series B — a precise stage-focus that most companies in this pool don't bother to state.
Services and capabilities: Fireart Studio vs Orbix Studio
| Capability | Fireart Studio | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Fireart Studio vs Orbix Studio
| Framework / platform | Fireart Studio | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Fireart Studio vs Orbix Studio
| Criterion | Fireart Studio | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Time & materials | Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Fireart Studio vs Orbix Studio
| Dimension | Fireart Studio | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | End-to-end SaaS product design and development, Startup MVP design and build | Seed-stage B2B SaaS MVP design and front-end build, Fintech product design for a Series A-B startup |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Fireart Studio vs Orbix Studio: pros and cons
| Fireart Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients over 12 years is one of the deepest track records among boutiques here |
| + | Clutch-recognized 'Leading UX Design Team,' plus Top Graphic Design Company nods from DesignRush and The Manifest |
| + | Grew from 1 to 150+ people while retaining a single-studio, boutique culture |
| + | Pairs product design with full software development, cutting hand-off risk |
| - | Relocated its HQ from Ukraine to Warsaw amid regional instability — worth noting for delivery-continuity planning |
| - | $20K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) is mid-tier, not the cheapest option in this pool |
| - | Development-heavy focus means marginally less pure design specialization than research-only companies |
| Orbix Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Built specifically for funded startups at the seed-through-Series-B stage, a precise positioning few others in this pool share |
| + | Small team size (10–30) means direct founder-to-founder access rather than layered account management |
| + | Combines product design with front-end development, reducing hand-off risk for early-stage teams |
| + | Covers three complex, high-value verticals (B2B SaaS, fintech, healthtech) despite its youth |
| - | Founded in 2023 — by a wide margin the thinnest public track record of any company in this pool |
| - | 10–30 person team caps capacity for large or multi-workstream programs |
| - | Minimum engagement is not published, so budget planning requires a direct conversation |
Who should choose Fireart Studio?
A typical fit: end-to-end SaaS product design and development.
700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients, backed by Clutch's independently verified 'Leading UX Design Team' recognition. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Who should choose Orbix Studio?
A typical fit: seed-stage B2B SaaS MVP design and front-end build.
The newest company in this pool, built specifically around the seed-to-Series-B funded startup stage. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Fireart Studio vs Orbix Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Fireart Studio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Fireart Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Fireart Studio ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) vs Orbix Studio (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Orbix Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Fireart Studio vs Orbix Studio
| Use case | Fireart Studio fit | Orbix Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| End-to-end SaaS product design and development | Strong | Limited | Fireart Studio |
| Startup MVP design and build | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Seed-stage B2B SaaS MVP design and front-end build | Limited | Strong | Orbix Studio |
| Fintech product design for a Series A-B startup | Limited | Strong | Orbix Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Fireart Studio vs Orbix Studio
Fireart Studio (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients, backed by Clutch's independently verified 'Leading UX Design Team' recognition.
Orbix Studio (3.5/5) is worth a look if you need fintech product design for a Series A-B startup. If your situation matches that, Orbix Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Fireart Studio vs Orbix Studio FAQ
Is Fireart Studio better than Orbix Studio?
Fireart Studio (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Fireart Studio's strongest advantage: 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients over 12 years is one of the deepest track records among boutiques here. Orbix Studio's strongest advantage: built specifically for funded startups at the seed-through-Series-B stage, a precise positioning few others in this pool share.
How do Fireart Studio and Orbix Studio differ in pricing?
Fireart Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Orbix Studio uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Fireart Studio or Orbix Studio?
Fireart Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Fireart Studio and Orbix Studio?
Fireart Studio's primary differentiator is: 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients, backed by Clutch's independently verified 'Leading UX Design Team' recognition. Orbix Studio's primary differentiator is: the newest company in this pool, built specifically around the seed-to-Series-B funded startup stage. They also differ in team size (100–150+ vs 10–30), minimum engagement ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs Not published), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products vs SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.