Ramotion vs Gapsy Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) edges ahead of Ramotion (4.0/5) overall. Gapsy Studio is the better choice for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history.. Ramotion is the stronger option for startups and mid-market companies wanting brand identity and product design bundled into one engagement.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Ramotion vs Gapsy Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Ramotion | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2009 | 2014 |
| HQ | San Francisco, CA, USA | Dnipro, Ukraine |
| Team size | 29–70+ (company states 70+ experts; third-party trackers report lower core headcount) | Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Best for | Startups and mid-market companies wanting brand identity and product design bundled into one engagement. | Fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, T&M | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Webflow, React | Figma, Webflow, After Effects |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail |
Ramotion vs Gapsy Studio: overview
Ramotion
Ramotion has run out of San Francisco since 2009, with additional offices in Los Angeles and New York. Team size is genuinely contested: the company states '70+ team experts,' while third-party trackers put core headcount as low as ~29 (company states 70+ experts; third-party trackers report lower core headcount) — a gap worth clarifying directly. Its work spans brand identity, UX/UI, and web/mobile app development across a wide client range.
Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio describes itself as operating 'since 2014' (also citing '9+ years of experience'; treated here as self-reported), based in Dnipro, Ukraine. Rather than publish a headcount, it positions itself as a 'collective of creative professionals' behind 500+ completed projects. A 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews and 13+ international awards (Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, DesignRush) back its work across UI/UX, branding, motion, and web/app development for fintech, SaaS, health, education, and retail clients.
Services and capabilities: Ramotion vs Gapsy Studio
| Capability | Ramotion | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Ramotion vs Gapsy Studio
| Framework / platform | Ramotion | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Ramotion vs Gapsy Studio
| Criterion | Ramotion | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time & materials | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Ramotion vs Gapsy Studio
| Dimension | Ramotion | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | Brand identity plus product design bundle for a startup, Website and mobile app redesign for a mid-market company | Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work, Healthcare or EdTech product redesign |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Ramotion vs Gapsy Studio: pros and cons
| Ramotion | |
|---|---|
| + | 16 continuous years in operation since 2009 |
| + | Combines brand identity with product design and app development inside one team |
| + | Serves both early-stage startups and Fortune 500 clients, offering flexible scale |
| + | Three US offices (San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York) |
| - | Team size is genuinely disputed (company states 70+, trackers report as low as ~29) — worth clarifying before signing |
| - | $25K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) sits mid-tier, not the most accessible in this pool |
| - | Broad brand-plus-product positioning trades off some depth against product-only specialists |
| Gapsy Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this pool |
| + | 13+ international design awards across Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush |
| + | 500+ completed projects demonstrates a substantial delivery track record |
| + | Covers five distinct industries (fintech, SaaS, health, education, retail) from one team |
| - | Doesn't publish a specific headcount, describing itself as a 'collective' — harder to gauge delivery capacity |
| - | Founding year is self-reported ('since 2014') rather than independently confirmed |
| - | Its broad five-industry positioning trades off some depth against single-vertical specialists like UXDA |
Who should choose Ramotion?
Ramotion is the right choice for startups and mid-market companies wanting brand identity and product design bundled into one engagement..
Combines brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for clients ranging from startups to Fortune 500. Minimum engagement starts at $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Who should choose Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio is the right choice for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history..
A 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards from Behance, Awwwards, and FWA. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail.
Decision matrix: Ramotion vs Gapsy Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Ramotion |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Gapsy Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Gapsy Studio |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Gapsy Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Ramotion vs Gapsy Studio
| Use case | Ramotion fit | Gapsy Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand identity plus product design bundle for a startup | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Website and mobile app redesign for a mid-market company | Strong | Limited | Ramotion |
| Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work | Limited | Strong | Gapsy Studio |
| Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Limited | Strong | Gapsy Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Ramotion vs Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards from Behance, Awwwards, and FWA. It is best for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history..
Ramotion (4.0/5) is the better choice when startups and mid-market companies wanting brand identity and product design bundled into one engagement.. If your situation matches those criteria, Ramotion is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Ramotion vs Gapsy Studio FAQ
Is Ramotion better than Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Ramotion is better for startups and mid-market companies wanting brand identity and product design bundled into one engagement.. Gapsy Studio is better for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history..
How do Ramotion and Gapsy Studio differ in pricing?
Ramotion uses fixed project, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Gapsy Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Ramotion or Gapsy Studio?
Ramotion is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Ramotion and Gapsy Studio?
Ramotion's primary differentiator is: combines brand identity work with ux/ui and app development for clients ranging from startups to fortune 500. Gapsy Studio's primary differentiator is: a 5.0/5.0 clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards from behance, awwwards, and fwa. They also differ in team size (29–70+ (company states 70+ experts; third-party trackers report lower core headcount) vs Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects)), minimum engagement ($25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products vs Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.